Home

2 0n two or 3 0n 3 0r bolth

Submitted by benhunter on Thu, 2007-11-08 21:01.

So when i suggested a two on two i just thought of it as a secondary tourny. I am playing with jake and crandle, in the 3 on three, but should we just do a two v two. i dont think so itheink we do bolth. and i dont think we need to be real strict about the different sit ies just to break up the bestes team , chicago can do whatever they like

oh and nyc can bring it we got a basher to mash her

fuck beruit

» login or register to post comments |

and fuck

Submitted by benhunter on Thu, 2007-11-08 21:02.

nyc

» login or register to post comments |

Are you drunk?

Submitted by lucky on Fri, 2007-11-09 09:26.

Are you drunk?

» login or register to post comments |

i hope your not passing on

Submitted by crash on Sat, 2007-11-10 16:03.

i hope your not passing on these poor spelling and typing skills to the little ones.

i am very confused to what you are talking about here besides that if it were a 3 on 3 tourney it would be me, you, and crandog, which i was already aware of.

jonny...kev...can one of you translate?

» login or register to post comments |

ever since that concussion

Submitted by kev on Sun, 2007-11-11 23:10.

ever since that concussion courtesy of crandall in the finals, ben has never really been the same. say a prayer for him and his children, will ya?

» login or register to post comments |

So i will try to interpret this a bit

Submitted by jonnyhunter on Mon, 2007-11-12 19:28.

So I think ben is trying to ask whether there needs to be two tournaments or one. The idea right now is that maybe we would just do a two on two tournament and let the three on three not happen this year. I like the idea of a two on two because it is really different then what we have had in the past and it would be fun to mix it with just one other player. But i also think that maybe we should do both tournaments. There are not going to be 15 teams coming so maybe if we had two tournaments it would be doable plus a hell of a day or two if we decided.

It is going to be fucking cold and should be a ton of fun no matter what.

Also madison is calling friendlies for Dec. 9th,

jonny

» login or register to post comments |

Ahhhh, I see. 2 on 2 is a

Submitted by lucky on Tue, 2007-11-13 07:51.

Ahhhh, I see.

2 on 2 is a lot of fun, but 3 on 3 gets more bodies warming up out on the court.

I'll put the word out here and on MPLSbikelove.com about friendlies.

» login or register to post comments |

ben here on jonnys computer

Submitted by jonnyhunter on Tue, 2007-11-13 17:02.

um thats kinda what i was getting at, and i cant remeber if i was drunk or not.

this is the deal its not a tourny its a classic.

there can be a two on two deal going on one side and a three on three deal on the otehr.

we can get through all the matches in a couple hours if we limit the games to 30 sec each

» login or register to post comments |

First to one? Whoever wins

Submitted by lucky on Wed, 2007-11-14 07:15.

First to one? Whoever wins the joust wins the game? How about a goalie-less shoot off? Best of 5 tries wins.

Oh, and Chicago will be there.

» login or register to post comments |

how bout morality

Submitted by benhunter on Thu, 2007-11-15 00:40.

you think hell show his sorry face, or has he retired since he won his trophy for the cut and screw

» login or register to post comments |