just for the record.
I have a string of thoughts from the past few days
* tourneys should be run by committee, it is too much for one or two people to take on and it sucks for one or two individuals to have to make split decisions, that often times due to lack of sleep, general chaos, stress, and ignorance, they are not qualified to make. leaving players and teams pissed at someone whose fault its really not...
* polo and messenger races need to be their own separate thing. if the happen to coincide at the same time fine, but neither should make concessions to the other, way to many people don't give a shit about polo, and i don't give a shit about races, unless joe wins.
* Going over the rules shouldn't be rushed through so we can get to the game play. That is like not having a safe word.
* self regulating players? i don't think so

Sounds like...
...you just volunteered to help us with the NACCCs. Meetings are Thursdays at 7:30.
We've gotten a lot more cooperation and leeway from the race committee than Brian got from the folks in Toronto. We'll see how it goes, but you're probably right about separating polo tourneys and big races.
How much power would you give these refs you want? Could they penalize? Award possession? Take points away? Stop the clock?
Would they be dedicated referees who had to prove knowledge of the rules, or would they be volunteer players from a city neutral to the game on the court?